美国大学评为A的驳论文格式,给的例文可作TWE
美国大学评为A的驳论文格式,给的例文可作TWE本文简介:驳论文重要的几个方面:第一段一定要有主题句.主题句就是表明你立场的句子.注意,有的人喜欢两个方面都考虑.其实这是大忌.两方面都赞同有的时候会confuse读者.最好就是同意一方面到底!文章主体一定要从正面,反面去讨论,一定要把结果讨论到.多举例子支持自己的观点.也不要用自己的假设去支持,有的时候很明
美国大学评为A的驳论文格式,给的例文可作TWE本文内容:
驳论文重要的几个方面:
第一段一定要有主题句.主题句就是表明你立场的句子.注意,有的人喜欢两个方面都考虑.
其实这是大忌.两方面都赞同有的时候会confuse读者.最好就是同意一方面到底!
文章主体一定要从正面,反面去讨论,一定要把结果讨论到.多举例子支持自己的观点.也不要用自己的假设去支持,有的时候很明显的假设对很多人来说不成立.就要很多权威的数据来支持你的论点.
有的人喜欢在结尾前讨论下反面观点的长处,其实根本就是多此一举,这么做就削弱了你的驳论.
下面一个范文仅供参考.
Do
you
think
students
attend
single-sex
school
can
be
more
academically
successful
or
students
attend
co-ed
school
can
be
more
academically
successful?
The
Bush
administration
regards
same-sex
education
as
a
cure-all
for
what
ails
the
nation
s
public
schools.
Part
of
this
may
be
true
if
they
think
males
and
females
need
different
styles
of
education
and
attention.However,in
the
21st
century,in
such
a
competitive
society,a
female
can’t
request
to
be
treated
differently
in
a
job
because
she
is
a
female.
Co-ed
schools
not
only
nurture
students
to
be
academically
successful
through
equality,but
also
provide
them
with
an
environment
that
they
can’t
obtain
from
single-sex
schools.
(主题句)
注意!有的人喜欢用句子象“下面我要提供我的观点“,“下面我要就这个论点去讨论“之类的,这样的句子实际上是多余的,也在一开始就暴露你的缺点,切记!
Wendy
Kaminer,a
Smith
graduate
said,“All
female
schools
are
‘models
of
equivocation’.
They
reinforce
regressive
notions
of
sex
difference
while
at
the
same
time
helping
women
into
professions.”
In
70s
and
80s,it
was
relatively
liberal
for
women
to
be
educated
in
same-sex
schools;
they
were
well
aware
of
the
differences
in
education
for
boys
and
girls
and
the
abilities
that
each
gender
had
on
different
things.
However,women,most
of
the
time,were
stereotyped
as
only
good
at
housework,clerical
job,nursing,and
child
education.
On
the
other
hand,men
were
considered
the
main
support
to
a
family,and
generally
capable
of
doing
more
than
women.
This
view
has
been
gradually
changed
over
the
years.
Women
are
trying
to
improve
their
roles
in
society,and
they
strive
to
prove
they
can
be
just
as
good
as
men.
If
sex
segregation
continues,female
students
in
same-sex
schools
will
not
be
given
equal
chance
to
see
they
may
do
better
or
even
excel
over
men.(支持SINGLE-SEX
SCHOOL的结果)
(举例)I
am
a
great
example
to
support
this
standpoint.
I’ve
attended
a
co-ed
school
since
I
was
seven
years
old.
My
classmates
and
I
had
been
told
by
some
teachers
that
girls
couldn’t
excel
on
scientific
subjects.
Although
it
was
wrong
of
the
teachers
to
say
such
discouraging
words
to
female
students,I
never
gave
up
on
studying
scientific
subjects
harder.
By
neglecting
such
comments
from
teachers
and
concentrating
on
studying
math,physics,and
chemistry,I
achieved
better
grades
and
surpassed
most
boys
in
my
class
with
the
efforts
I
had
put
in.
It
is
important
that
women
be
put
in
equal
nurturing
and
competing
positions,with
no
conscious
influencing
thoughts
that
women
are
inferior
on
some
aspects
compared
to
men.
They
can
prove
themselves
as
good
as
men
on
academics
and
in
career
choices.
Secondly,co-ed
schools
provide
an
interactive
environment
for
boys
and
girls
to
study
together
so
they
can
learn
from
each
other.(支持CO-ED
SCHOOL的正面论点)
It’s
true
that
there
are
clear
distinctions
between
males
and
females.
However,by
separating
them
and
giving
different
educational
concepts,they
may
still
develop
their
individual
academic
strength,but
they
won’t
be
able
to
observe
or
compare
advantages
and
disadvantages
between
males
and
females
in
the
same
situation.(先说明SINGLE-SEX
SCHOOL的正面,然后提出它的弱点)
(举例)
For
example,in
a
research
assignment,a
male
student
can
do
mechanical
jobs
efficiently,but
he
may
lack
the
ability
to
organize
and
find
faults
whereas
a
female
student
who
is
better
at
these
aspects
may
help
him.
Thus,the
male
student
can
benefit
from
this
cooperation
and
learn
how
to
perform
better
next
time.
The
same
applies
to
the
girl
in
learning
as
regards
the
mechanical
skills
from
her
male
partner.
Co-ed
schools
provide
the
reciprocal
and
interactive
opportunities
for
male
and
female
students
so
that
they
can
learn
from
each
other
and
make
progress
simultaneously.
It
is
not
only
academic
strength
that
makes
a
student
successful
in
the
future
–
social
skills,teamwork
spirit,and
networking
prolongs
the
success
on
career
paths.
Single-sex
schools
can
potentially
form
a
“false
protection”
for
boys
and
girls
in
the
long
run.(反面)
Boys
and
girls
in
same-sex
schools
only
communicate
and
make
friends
with
the
same
sex.
On
the
contrary,co-ed
school
is
like
a
miniature
of
the
society.
Coed
school’s
students
not
only
interact
with
everyone
on
a
daily
basis,but
also
their
social
horizons
can
be
enlarged.
They
make
male
and
female
friends
who
may
become
their
future
“business
partners”
or
“social
guides”.
Boys
learn
how
to
communicate
with
girls
in
teamwork;
girls’
confidence
is
enhanced
when
both
male
and
female
classmates
acknowledge
them.
Our
ultimate
goal
is
to
make
the
education
system
better.
Sex
segregation
makes
it
harder
to
find
a
good
way
to
educate
students
comprehensively
and
make
both
genders’
academic
progresses
parallel.
Only
by
considering
both
genders
as
a
unified
entity
can
we
overcome
the
academic
shortcomings
of
the
educational
system.
Boys
and
girls
educated
in
a
co-ed
system
can
then
have
a
wider
scope
of
future
accomplishments.(再次强调自己的论点)